SP 2004 Syllabus

Home | Up | FA 2001 Syllabus | SP 2002 Syllabus | SP 2004 Syllabus | FA 2004 Syllabus

Note: This Syllabus is missing one week! I could not find the archived syllabus. -- ALB 01/04/05

Course Description and Objectives (Theory)

Academic Foundations (What’s this class about?)

The English department’s goals for English 101 are available for your review at www.southernct.edu/ ~hochman/101goalsandobjectives. In essence, you are required to compose 25-30 pages of “polished,” research-based analysis, with writing projects that are a minimum of 1250 words to a maximum of 3750 words.[1] You are also required to read 100-300 pages of non-fiction prose. Above all, you are expected to think and write. This is not a class about summary or regurgitation, but one that requires active thinking, questioning, and a committed investment of time and dedication. Though the work may be at times difficult, I believe that the rewards are worthwhile.

A note about my teaching methods. I fervently believe that the best form of education is one of self-discovery; therefore, my role is that of guide, not taskmaster. When it comes to the realm of ideas, there are very few situations in which I will say that something is “right” or “incorrect.” These are terms I usually reserve for documentation, grammar, formatting, and similar forms and structures that have defined rules as to usage and applications. Rather than pass judgment on an interpretation, an analysis, or an essay topic, I will usually ask questions so that you may consider your ideas from another perspective and therefore evaluate for yourself.

Students’ Rights and Responsibilities                               

Syllabus                     This syllabus defines the mutual expectations and requirements for this class. Just as I am expected to fulfill my part of this agreement (as to my office hours, grading procedures, and class scheduling), you are expected to fulfill your parts of this agreement (by being prepared for class, submitting work according to the guidelines listed herein, and the like). Each student is responsible for reviewing this syllabus and making sure that its terms are understood. If circumstances require changes to this agreement, the class will be notified both during one class session and via email.

Prerequisites             Course work in 101 assumes that you are building upon a foundation set in college-level English classes. It is expected that you are familiar with MLA citation and general grammatical terms and usage. To be a student in English 101, it is REQUIRED that you a) have taken and PASSED English 100 (if you’re a transfer, you will have taken the approved equivalent at another university or college), b) were placed in 101 without a pre-requisite due to your score on the composition placement exam, or c) were placed in 101 from 98 via portfolio. If neither A, B, nor C apply to you, you are in the wrong class.

Special Needs             As a student with a disability, before you may receive accommodations in this class, you will need to make an appointment with the Disability Resource Center (EN C016). To speak with me about accommodations or other information such as emergency medical information or special arrangements in case the building must be evacuated, please make an appointment with me as soon as possible.

Multilingual              Multilingual students are encouraged to check out Part 11 (“For Multilingual Writers”) of SMH. Additional resources are available, both online and offline.

Grading                      The grading structure of this class is designed to emphasize improvement. If you revise an essay, you will earn the revised grade (whether it is higher or lower than the original). We will develop the grading criteria for the essays. Generally, grades represent the following evaluations (with +/- further defining the spectrum):

§         A: outstanding work. Well-argued and analyzed. Carefully considered and drafted.  Few (if any) errors in grammar. Vocabulary is rich and precise.

§         B: work well done. Demonstrates effort and careful consideration. An effective analysis. Few grammatical errors.

§         C: average work. Fulfills minimum requirements for assignment.

§         D: poor work. Grammatical, organizational, and content errors. Incomplete analysis.

§         R: Work must be revised in order to earn credit.

§         F: unacceptable or non-existent work.

Late Assignments                 Late work is accepted only in cases of illness or emergencies; documentation (such as a doctor’s note) is required. If you will be absent, the work must be in my mailbox (located in the English department mailroom) before 5:00 on the date due. If your assignment will not be ready on time, contact me via email before 3:00 on the date due; we will need to discuss your options for the course. Emailed assignments are not accepted.

Cancellation of Class            If the weather is inclement, call SCSU Weather Check (203) 392-5520. Commuters should use their discretion if driving conditions are or may become hazardous. If you should come to class and there is no posted notice of cancellation, begin the assignment for the day. If I am not in the classroom fifteen minutes after the beginning of class (without communication), you may assume that class is canceled. Leave a signed attendance list in my mailbox along with any work that is due. Keep up with the assignments on the syllabus.

The English Department Policy on Attendance and Academic Honesty [My notes in brackets]

Attendance: Our classes are communities in which we emphasize the process of learning. In order to create and sustain an environment in which students may participate responsibly and cooperatively in the learning process, regular attendance is essential. The value the English Dept. places on community and process is reflected and supported by the following policy on attendance:

1)  Absences: Students are counted absent when they miss a day of class. Absences are counted from the very first day that classes are scheduled to begin, regardless of when an individual student first begins attending class.

2)  Undocumented Absences: For a class that meets twice a week, students are allowed two undocumented absences. Within these limits, students need present no excuse for their absence, nor will faculty penalize them. It is assumed that undocumented absences will be reserved for emergencies. Students are responsible for assigned work.

3)  Documented Absences: Students who miss classes beyond the quota of undocumented absences must give their instructors a reason for their absence. In the case of illness, students must provide written verification. Instructors may request written verification for other reasons as well. Depending on the reason, and verification thereof, instructors may or may not penalize students for absences beyond the quota of undocumented absences (see #2) but not excessive (see #4). Students are responsible for assigned work.

4)  Excessive Absences: Students who accumulate excessive absences, for whatever reason, will receive a grade of F in the course. For a class that meets twice a week, six absences are excessive.

5)   Extenuating Circumstances: An extenuating circumstance, such as prolonged illness, may cause an extended absence. For students in such extenuating circumstances, instructors may file for a late withdrawal, provided that students present written verification. Specifically, students with an extended absence of six or more days should present instructors with an extended absence card obtained from the Counseling Office (see Student Handbook). Students with an extended absence of fewer than six days should provide instructors with a written verification, such as a doctor's note. [Absence affects the quality of participation and performance on essays, assignments, and exams. Therefore, more than two absences will affect your grade. Furthermore, after an absence, you are expected to return to class with readings and assignments up to date. Attending this class means more than being physically present. You are expected to come to this class having read (and re-read), reflected, and written. If you are not prepared, you will earn with partial absence (it’s better to be in class than out of it). Chronically late students will be penalized with a partial absence, or, should the situation continue, a full absence.]
Academic Honesty: Plagiarism, cheating, and other forms of academic dishonesty are serious offenses. Dishonesty in written work will result in a grade of F in the course. In addition, dishonesty is adequate cause for disciplinary action by the Office of the Dean of Academic Affairs. See the section on "Academic Honesty" in the Student Handbook. [Note: You are required to read SMH 18 (“Acknowledging Sources and Avoiding Plagiarism”). If you are unsure of how properly to cite information (or whether or not you should cite it), ASK. Plagiarism (regardless of intent) is grounds for failure in this class and is required to be reported to the department chair and the dean.]

 

Course Work (The Theory in Practice)

Texts (bring both to each class) (syllabus abbreviation in parentheses):

Bartholomae, David, and Anthony Petrosky, eds. Ways of Reading. 6th ed. Boston: Bedford-St. Martin’s, 2002. (WR)

Lunsford, Andrea A. The St. Martin’s Handbook. 5th ed. Boston: Bedford-St. Martin’s, 2003. (SMH)

Also Required:

§         2 Computer Disks (min.) for work

§         College Dictionary & Thesaurus (not the one bundled with your word processing program)

Assignments and Grade Distribution

Due

Assignment

Val.

All

Class Participation (includes Workshops [WS] and pop quizzes)

Evaluation based on preparation and meaningful input that adds to our community

8%

All

Annotated Works Cited Entries (AWCs). Annotated Works Cited Entries are composed of two main parts: the MLA citation (the information as to author, title of work, date and place of publication, and publisher) and an annotation (which contains, as you may notice, the word “note” within). The annotation is also composed of two parts: a summary and an analysis. Your analysis should consider the validity of the author’s arguments, relevance to other texts we’ve read, and perhaps the greater relevance to the course in general. The AWC’s are to be typed and submitted for grade, and you may be asked to share them in class.

5%

All

Listserv (LS)[2] Contributions (due by noon the day listed)

Evaluation based on timely and thorough completion of the assignments.

5%

TBA

Oral Presentation I: A presentation on one of the units we’re covering. You will work with a group to prepare a 15-20 minute presentation concerning various facets of the text. You are encouraged to use a variety of media and sources in your presentation. The group also will submit an outline of the presentation and a brief overview of the concepts and sources.

2%

2/18

Essay I: Education (or is it Philosophy?) (1250 wds. plus outline and Works Cited)

5%

 

Essay II: Literature (or is it Women’s Studies?) (1250 wds. plus outline and Works Cited)

7.5%

 

Essay III: Technology (or is it Art?) (1250 wds. plus outline and Works Cited)

10%

 

Essay IV: History (or is it Education, or Literature, or Sociology?) (1250 wds. plus outline and Works Cited)

12.5%

 

Research Project (final submission in portfolio form):

000%

 

Research Proposal (750 words, plus an outline)

5%

 

Annotated Works Cited for your specific topic. Minimum 10 sources.

10%

All

Process Work: Research Question / Outline/ Citation Exercise / Drafts

3%

5/12

Researched Analysis (2000 words minimum plus Works Cited and Outline). Min. 7 sources (not including reference materials)

20%

Fin.

Response/Critique: Expectations vs. Outcomes on Project

2%

Fin.

Oral Presentation: Final Research Project (5-10 mins.)

5%

 

Written Work Submission Format/Design

Listserv Assignments           See SMH 7a.

All Other Written Work

Remember to create a title for your work that will capture your reader’s interest!

§         Word Processing: Workshop drafts and final versions must be word-processed. If you do not have a computer, use the labs at SCSU.

§         Format (document design): Use MLA Format/Citation. Follow SMH 8e. For an example of proper pagination, spacing, and margins, see sample paper see the sample essay that concludes SMH 20. Use an Arial, Helvetica, Times, or Courier font (or equivalent) at either a 10 or 12 point size. Please staple pages.

§         Quotations, Summary, and Paraphrasing: Documentation according to MLA (Modern Language Association) standards. See SMH 18 and 20; we will also review in class.

§         First Submissions: Each of your essays submitted should include:

§         Outline: A formal outline of your work.  Your outline may be a part of your drafting process or it may be a part of your editing process, but it should be a part of your writing. See SMH 3e, 19b, and the model on 442-44 for guidance.

§         Works Cited: Whether you quote a source directly, paraphrase it, or summarize, it should be both noted in the body of your essay (indicate the text[s] in which the information or ideas appeared and, for example, the page number[s] [in the case of written materials] in which it appeared) and be fully cited on your Works Cited page.

Neither the outline nor the works cited “count” towards the paper length.

§                     Revisions: If essay is a revision, submit the graded essay and grading sheet with revision. If the original essay and grading sheet is not submitted, the revision will not be accepted.

The key to correction marks is in the back pages of SMH. Numerical notations refer to the “Twenty Most Common Surface Errors” (see page 14 of SMH).  You are expected to familiarize yourself with the notation for a) your own revision/editing process and b) for helping peers during workshop.

 

Schedule (subject to revision as necessary)

Assignments are listed on the day that they are due— be sure to read (and plan) ahead.

1/26

Course Introduction and syllabus review.

1/28

WR: Read Paolo Freire, “The ‘Banking’ Concept of Education” (258-73). The text is also available at www.cddc.vt.edu/eeddll/freire.html or www.webster.edu/~corbetre/philosophy/education/ freire/freire-2.html. Write a brief (one typed page) response to Freire, then review Richard Paul and Linda Elder’s “The Elements of Critical Thinking” (www.criticalthinking.org/University/ helps.html). On a separate paper, evaluate and reconsider that first response to Freire based on the guidelines (in other words, critique your critique). Bring in both responses to class on Wednesday; you may be asked to read one or both responses. LS: Sign up for the listserv ( email eng101ab-subscribe@lists.southernct.edu). You will receive a “challenge” email to which you must reply. In Class: Outlining texts (careful, close, and precise reading); AWC format; review of MLA. By the end of class, you will have a question to pose to Freire and will have identified some key terms that will help you as you research an answer. Sign up for Presentations.

2/02

Research: You should complete this assignment at Buley, but some of this can be online via library.scsu.ctstateu.edu/newdbs.html. Should you get an authentication error, check out www.consuls.org/screens/accesshelp.html. Armed with your question for Freire, you will use your wits and research savvy to “discover” his answer. Review some of the databases at newdbs.html. Use the types of databases that would best help you with your question (e.g., if your question concerns Freire’s Marxist ideology, both the Encyclopedia of Philosophy and EconLit First Search might be useful, while the Grove Dictionary of Art probably wouldn’t help). Choose three or four different databases, and search using the keywords you’ve identified for your topic. You may need to try different variations or partial searches.  Print out the first page of your search results for each of the databases you search. Choose the three best sources (they might not be the first results!). Locate those sources (they may be in the library, or may be a full-text resource via the database). Photocopy them, print them, or save them to disk, along with full citation information (identify both the original source as well as [if applicable] its online location via the database). Write an AWC for one of the texts (the other two are due 2/9). Bring in your process work—the printouts of search results, articles, AWC, and the like—to class. LS: Introduce yourself to the list (to post, send your email eng101ab@lists.southernct.edu. You must be subscribed to post). Tell us who you are, where you’re from, hobbies, intended major... During the course of this semester, you will be engaging in online conversations with students both in your section and another section of 101, so give people who might not otherwise know you in “real” space a chance to understand who you are. BEFORE POSTING, review SMH 7a! In class: more Freire. Evaluate sources. WS: Your Question for Freire and the thesis.

2/09

LS: What advice might you give to your fellow writers? What techniques work best for you? Remember, a listserv is not a soapbox, but a conversational medium. Don’t simply post and run, but read, consider, and respond to others. Develop thesis for Essay I. Your thesis is one sentence that defines your topic, presents the main points of your argument, and sets the order for your essay. WS: Review additional supporting texts. From thesis statement, develop structural outline for essay. Hand in other 2 AWCs.

2/11

In class: workshop Essay 1. Bring in two typed copies of your completed essay (Laptop labs: also bring on disk, please). Group I Presentations.

2/16

Presidents’ Day. NO CLASS

2/18

Essay I due. Review the submission criteria before handing your work in! Group II Presentations. WR: Adrienne Rich, “When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-vision” (624-50). Prepare an AWC for Rich. Signup for Group III and IV Presentations.

2/23

Continue Discussion of Rich. WS: Develop your question for Rich.

2/25

Research: Locate and evaluate three to four sources that will help you develop a response to your Rich question. You may begin to expand your sources—in addition to scholarly journals/databases, bring in (and I do mean bring in!) a book. Groups III and IV: Rich Presentations.

3/01

 

3/03

 

3/08

 

3/10

 

3/15

 

3/17

 

3/19

Last Day to Withdraw from Course.

3/22 & 3/24: SPRING BREAK

Note: The listservs (LS) for this half of the semester expect more in the way of work and response, and therefore will weigh more heavily on your final grade.

3/29

Essay II (Rich) due. In Class: Introduction to and discussion of Susan Griffin’s “Our Secret.”

3/31

Griffin AWC due. In class: read AWCs in class to launch discussion; make sure that your analysis invites conversation. WS: Bring in drafts (two printouts or, for laptop lab folks, printout and disk) of Berger paper. LS: Find out a bit about the people and events referred to in Griffin’s text. Pick an event (like the Battle of the Bulge) or a person (like Köllwitz or Griffin) and research, using at least two sources that are independent of each other. Prepare a short post (150 words or so) which brings together the information in your own words (parenthetical citation as appropriate); your post needs to contain an MLA works cited. Don’t forget to sign your post with your first name and last initial, or you will not earn credit for it.

4/05

Essay III (Berger) due. Griffin Oral Presentations. WS: Freewriting—Griffin essay topics. For next class, research two sources that will either give you background for your conversation with Griffin or may help to fill in gaps you may have concerning Griffin’s text. For example, you may wish to read some other chapters from the book from which “Our Secret” was taken, A Chorus of Stones, in the attempt to understand what Griffin’s ‘grand scheme’ is. Another option may be to research a person who becomes a character in the text, like Heinrich Himmler or Kathe Köllwitz, with the goal of understanding such concepts as history and literature. Use the writing process to uncover your own interests; as a freewriting exercise, do not get hung up on grammar or a thesis, just write what you’re thinking. We will discuss in class.

4/07

Essay I (Freire) Revision due. Follow Guidelines for revision (Syllabus I, 4). Two Griffin Sources AWC due. In class: You may be asked to share one of your AWCs with the class, so you may wish to explain in your AWC how your sources tie in to your question or problem. Continue discussion of Griffin in context of your research and questioning.

4/12

In Class: Continue discussion of Griffin in context of your research and questioning. WS: Freewriting—research topic. What questions have arisen while reading this semester’s selections? Have you questioned your “gaps” in history? Has your curiosity about art been reawakened? Have you come to question the educational system, or perhaps wondered about the ways that language shapes our understanding? Perhaps you want to stretch even further, and use Berger and Rich as a stepping-stone to question whether an artist like Andy Warhol could create his famous silkscreens of Campbell’s soup cans in today’s copyright conscious and litigious society. Keep in mind throughout this process that I expect you to bring the lessons of Freire, Rich, Berger, and Griffin with you in more than just the topic—I expect you to rethink your usual approach to and consideration of the research project.

4/14

Essay IV (Griffin) due. LS: Based on your freewriting, write a short paragraph stating your intent for your research project. LS grade will be based on both your post AND your input on others’ posts (feedback, suggestions, sources, ideas). In Class: Developing research paper proposal. A good overview of what a proposal entails is available at Dr. Elisa Kay Sparks’s course page at http://hubcap.clemson.edu/~sparks/sffilm/sfrpprop.html, from which I’ve synthesized the following guidelines. Generally, The proposal should:

·   Define your topic. You will need to figure how to make your topic manageable for a 2,000 word paper. The bulk of your work for your final project is expected to be your informed analysis, meaning that outside scholarship should complement your writing and ideas.

·   Your scholarship and your background as a researcher as it pertains to this topic. What are your assumptions concerning the topic? What do you know? What do you want to discover/ uncover/ come to understand? What types of sources have you researched? What additional types of sources might you need? It is expected that you do at least some preliminary research before beginning your proposal, if only to determine the feasibility of your project.

·   How will your analysis add to the conversation? In other words, how will your informed perspective contribute to the existing scholarship and analysis? You are a researcher and analyst; this work is not to be a ‘banking’ exercise.

·   And, to quote Dr. Sparks:

Anticipated Problems and Next Move -- Where do you think you are going to have the most trouble doing this project? What's going to get you hung up? Are you going to be able to deal with these problems? How? Where are you going to go from here? What other sources are there that you haven't yet consulted? What other aspects of the topic do you need to take into consideration?

4/19

Research Project Proposal due. In Class: Review Proposals and discuss. WS: Beginning the Research Project AWCs.

4/21

WS: Research Project AWCs. Bring copies for review (2 copies or one disk/one printout).

4/26

Annotated Works Cited for your specific topic. Minimum ten sources. LS: What did you find to be the hardest part of the AWC process? What was the easiest? What tactics might help you to become a better researcher? What suggestions do you have for others on the list? WS: Drafting the research paper.

4/28

WS: Bring skeletal draft of research paper (basic sections or roadmap). Bring in notes from sources. We will work on bringing things together.

5/03

In Class: Review of Research Draft.

5/05

Workshop: Research Paper Draft. Two printouts (one printout plus disk).

5/10

Workshop: Research Paper Draft. Two printouts (one printout plus disk). Develop checklist.

5/12

Research Project Due. Refer to the sample MLA paper in SMH for reference. The project must include a response/critique (your personal response to this project, what you’ve learned, what you would do the same or differently, and other notes), your revised proposal, your outline, essay, MLA works cited for those sources used, and a revised annotated works cited. Course evaluations.

Final

If section meets MW 6:15-7:30, your final exam period is M, 5/17 from 6-8 PM; if section meets MW 7:35-8:50, your final exam period is W, 5/19 from 7:30-9:30 PM.

Research project oral presentations.  Each presentation should be approximately 5-10 minutes in length, and cover the scope of the project (i.e., your topic, the scholarship concerning the topic, your analysis and findings), what drew you to this topic, your research methods, your findings, and any “surprises” along the way. As this is a presentation, your grade will also be based on your oral presentation skills (e.g., addressing and interacting with your audience, making eye contact, not simply reading). A properly documented presentation outline with a works cited page is to be handed in with your presentation.

 


 

[1] Since page count depends upon such factors as font type and size, I define assignments by word count. Word counts do not include quotes or external framework such as the outline or works cited entries.

[2] A listserv (LS) is an online forum for you to discuss, consider, refine, and rethink what we have read and discussed in class. By posting to the LS, you continue to hone your writing skills in a medium that requires a different type of writing, one that needs to be precise yet brief. This LS is open only to students of the classes that I teach at SCSU. Once you’ve subscribed, any email that you send to eng101ab@lists.southernct.edu forwards your email to everyone else who is subscribed to the list.

Copyright 2003-2005 Andrea L. Beaudin (except where otherwise noted). All other works property of their respective copyright owners. All Rights Reserved. Redistribution, reposting, or other use of these materials without prior written consent is prohibited.  To request permission to redistribute the materials on this site, please  me.